Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Mules and hinnies — Stocks

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
614,803 An
in 2023
Pakistan
210,000 An
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
9th
Pakistan rank
10th

Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Pakistan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 614,803 An against 210,000 An in Pakistan, a difference of 404,803 An.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.9 times Pakistan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Pakistan ranks 10th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 1.57 million An 30,192 An 1.54 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 1.65 million An 58,000 An 1.59 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 685,088 An 65,900 An 619,188 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 621,949 An 104,000 An 517,949 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 494,613 An 191,200 An 303,413 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 581,350 An 181,000 An 400,350 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 589,818 An 204,500 An 385,318 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Pakistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 614,803 An against 210,000 An in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
404,803 An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Pakistan ranks 10th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks-2/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks-2/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Mules and hinnies — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).