USSR vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time
- USSR
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
USSR currently reports 1,300 An against 1,249 An in Zimbabwe, a difference of 51 An.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
USSR ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 86 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | USSR | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,356 An | 1,000 An | 2,356 An | USSR |
| 1970s | 2,400 An | 1,000 An | 1,400 An | USSR |
| 1980s | 1,400 An | 1,000 An | 400 An | USSR |
| 1990s | 1,300 An | 1,000 An | 300 An | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, USSR or Zimbabwe?
- USSR, at 1,300 An against 1,249 An in Zimbabwe as of 1991.
- What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between USSR and Zimbabwe?
- 51 An, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for USSR and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do USSR and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
- USSR ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).