Brazil vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Mules and hinnies — Stocks

Brazil
731,841 LSU
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
338,239 LSU
in 2023
Brazil rank
3rd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd

Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time

  • Brazil
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 731,841 LSU against 338,239 LSU in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 393,602 LSU.

That makes Brazil's figure about 2.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Brazil ranks 3rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 81 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 935,600 LSU 875,261 LSU 60,339 LSU Brazil
1970s 985,700 LSU 935,134 LSU 50,566 LSU Brazil
1980s 1.13 million LSU 368,412 LSU 758,135 LSU Brazil
1990s 1.04 million LSU 334,974 LSU 702,600 LSU Brazil
2000s 806,618 LSU 264,121 LSU 542,497 LSU Brazil
2010s 747,322 LSU 318,008 LSU 429,313 LSU Brazil
2020s 733,743 LSU 323,226 LSU 410,516 LSU Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, Brazil or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Brazil, at 731,841 LSU against 338,239 LSU in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between Brazil and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
393,602 LSU, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
Brazil ranks 3rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks/brazil/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks/brazil/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Brazil vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Mules and hinnies — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
119 places, 6,908 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.