Angola vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Angola
63,207 1000 ha
in 2025
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
459,978 1000 ha
in 2025
Angola rank
12th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Angola
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199020072025

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 459,978 1000 ha against 63,207 1000 ha in Angola, a difference of 396,771 1000 ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 7.3 times Angola's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 206 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 76,744 1000 ha 544,625 1000 ha 467,882 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 73,636 1000 ha 516,334 1000 ha 442,698 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 68,555 1000 ha 486,165 1000 ha 417,609 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 64,481 1000 ha 465,533 1000 ha 401,053 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Angola or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 459,978 1000 ha against 63,207 1000 ha in Angola as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Angola and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
396,771 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Angola and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Angola ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/angola/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/angola/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Angola vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.