Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
How they compare
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 4.21 1000 ha against 2.02 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 2.19 1000 ha.
That makes Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 2.1 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has been ahead every year.
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 192nd and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 189th of 206 countries.
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.02 1000 ha | 4.21 1000 ha | 2.19 1000 ha | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba |
| 2020s | 2.02 1000 ha | 4.21 1000 ha | 2.19 1000 ha | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
- Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 4.21 1000 ha against 2.02 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
- 2.19 1000 ha, with Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 192nd and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 189th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.