Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Oman: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2.02 1000 ha
in 2025
Oman
1.57 1000 ha
in 2025
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
192nd
Oman rank
193rd

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Oman
00.511.52199020072025

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 2.02 1000 ha against 1.57 1000 ha in Oman, a difference of 0.45 1000 ha.

That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 1.3 times Oman's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 192nd and Oman ranks 193rd of 206 countries.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 2.02 1000 ha 1.57 1000 ha 0.45 1000 ha Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2000s 2.02 1000 ha 1.57 1000 ha 0.45 1000 ha Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 2.02 1000 ha 1.57 1000 ha 0.45 1000 ha Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 2.02 1000 ha 1.57 1000 ha 0.45 1000 ha Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Oman?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 2.02 1000 ha against 1.57 1000 ha in Oman as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Oman?
0.45 1000 ha, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Oman?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Oman rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 192nd and Oman ranks 193rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Oman: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/oman/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Oman: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.