Australia and New Zealand vs Brazil: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Australia and New Zealand
139,374 1000 ha
in 2025
Brazil
476,873 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Brazil rank
3rd

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Brazil
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199020072025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 476,873 1000 ha against 139,374 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 337,499 1000 ha.

That makes Brazil's figure about 3.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Brazil ranks 3rd of 206 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Brazil Difference Ahead
1990s 140,428 1000 ha 588,868 1000 ha 448,440 1000 ha Brazil
2000s 138,093 1000 ha 539,379 1000 ha 401,286 1000 ha Brazil
2010s 137,836 1000 ha 506,662 1000 ha 368,825 1000 ha Brazil
2020s 139,210 1000 ha 484,807 1000 ha 345,597 1000 ha Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Australia and New Zealand or Brazil?
Brazil, at 476,873 1000 ha against 139,374 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Australia and New Zealand and Brazil?
337,499 1000 ha, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Brazil?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Brazil rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Brazil ranks 3rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Brazil: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia-and-new-zealand/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia-and-new-zealand/brazil/">Australia and New Zealand vs Brazil: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.