Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
How they compare
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 752,374 1000 ha against 139,374 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 613,000 1000 ha.
That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 5.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 7th of 206 countries.
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 140,428 1000 ha | 882,249 1000 ha | 741,821 1000 ha | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2000s | 138,093 1000 ha | 840,976 1000 ha | 702,884 1000 ha | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2010s | 137,836 1000 ha | 795,406 1000 ha | 657,569 1000 ha | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2020s | 139,210 1000 ha | 762,060 1000 ha | 622,850 1000 ha | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Australia and New Zealand or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 752,374 1000 ha against 139,374 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 613,000 1000 ha, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 7th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.