Australia and New Zealand vs United Republic of Tanzania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Australia and New Zealand
139,374 1000 ha
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
42,847 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
23rd

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • United Republic of Tanzania
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k140.0k199020072025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 139,374 1000 ha against 42,847 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 96,527 1000 ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 3.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 23rd of 240 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 140,428 1000 ha 55,798 1000 ha 84,630 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 138,093 1000 ha 51,768 1000 ha 86,324 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 137,836 1000 ha 47,672 1000 ha 90,164 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 139,210 1000 ha 44,020 1000 ha 95,191 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Australia and New Zealand or United Republic of Tanzania?
Australia and New Zealand, at 139,374 1000 ha against 42,847 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Australia and New Zealand and United Republic of Tanzania?
96,527 1000 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and United Republic of Tanzania?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 23rd of 240 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs United Republic of Tanzania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia-and-new-zealand/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia-and-new-zealand/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Australia and New Zealand vs United Republic of Tanzania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,468 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.