Australia vs Middle Africa: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Australia
131,504 1000 ha
in 2025
Middle Africa
317,657 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia rank
11th
Middle Africa rank
14th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Australia
  • Middle Africa
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 317,657 1000 ha against 131,504 1000 ha in Australia, a difference of 186,153 1000 ha.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 2.4 times Australia's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and Middle Africa ranks 14th of 240 countries.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 132,594 1000 ha 357,605 1000 ha 225,011 1000 ha Middle Africa
2000s 130,267 1000 ha 345,742 1000 ha 215,474 1000 ha Middle Africa
2010s 130,010 1000 ha 330,646 1000 ha 200,636 1000 ha Middle Africa
2020s 131,354 1000 ha 320,414 1000 ha 189,060 1000 ha Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Australia or Middle Africa?
Middle Africa, at 317,657 1000 ha against 131,504 1000 ha in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Australia and Middle Africa?
186,153 1000 ha, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Middle Africa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Middle Africa rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Australia ranks 11th and Middle Africa ranks 14th of 240 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Middle Africa: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia/middle-africa/">Australia vs Middle Africa: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,468 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.