Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Australia
131,504 1000 ha
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
618,897 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
6th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Australia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020072025

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 618,897 1000 ha against 131,504 1000 ha in Australia, a difference of 487,393 1000 ha.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 4.7 times Australia's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th of 202 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 132,594 1000 ha 713,866 1000 ha 581,272 1000 ha Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 130,267 1000 ha 681,259 1000 ha 550,992 1000 ha Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 130,010 1000 ha 650,384 1000 ha 520,375 1000 ha Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 131,354 1000 ha 625,954 1000 ha 494,600 1000 ha Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Australia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 618,897 1000 ha against 131,504 1000 ha in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
487,393 1000 ha, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Australia ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.