Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Australia
131,504 1000 ha
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
42,847 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Australia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k140.0k199020072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 131,504 1000 ha against 42,847 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 88,657 1000 ha.

That makes Australia's figure about 3.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 206 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 132,594 1000 ha 55,798 1000 ha 76,795 1000 ha Australia
2000s 130,267 1000 ha 51,768 1000 ha 78,499 1000 ha Australia
2010s 130,010 1000 ha 47,672 1000 ha 82,337 1000 ha Australia
2020s 131,354 1000 ha 44,020 1000 ha 87,334 1000 ha Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Australia, at 131,504 1000 ha against 42,847 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
88,657 1000 ha, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Australia ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.