Bahamas vs Western Sahara: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Bahamas
509.86 1000 ha
in 2025
Western Sahara
529.22 1000 ha
in 2025
Bahamas rank
126th
Western Sahara rank
125th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Bahamas
  • Western Sahara
0200400600199020072025

How they compare

Western Sahara currently reports 529.22 1000 ha against 509.86 1000 ha in Bahamas, a difference of 19.36 1000 ha.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 126th and Western Sahara ranks 125th of 202 countries.

Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1990s 509.86 1000 ha 575.79 1000 ha 65.93 1000 ha Western Sahara
2000s 509.86 1000 ha 538.5 1000 ha 28.64 1000 ha Western Sahara
2010s 509.86 1000 ha 537.56 1000 ha 27.7 1000 ha Western Sahara
2020s 509.86 1000 ha 531.22 1000 ha 21.36 1000 ha Western Sahara

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Bahamas or Western Sahara?
Western Sahara, at 529.22 1000 ha against 509.86 1000 ha in Bahamas as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Bahamas and Western Sahara?
19.36 1000 ha, with Western Sahara ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Western Sahara?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Bahamas and Western Sahara rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Bahamas ranks 126th and Western Sahara ranks 125th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Western Sahara: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/bahamas-the/western-sahara/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/bahamas-the/western-sahara/">Bahamas vs Western Sahara: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.