Belgium-Luxembourg vs Eswatini: Naturally regenerating forest β Area
Naturally regenerating forest β Area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 314.99 1000 ha against 287.86 1000 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 27.13 1000 ha.
That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 136th of 202 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest β area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Eswatini?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 314.99 1000 ha against 287.86 1000 ha in Eswatini as of 1999.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest β area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini?
- 27.13 1000 ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini rank globally for naturally regenerating forest β area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 136th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest β Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.