Belgium-Luxembourg vs Tajikistan: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 314.99 1000 ha against 307.34 1000 ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 7.65 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 133rd and Tajikistan ranks 135th of 206 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Tajikistan?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 314.99 1000 ha against 307.34 1000 ha in Tajikistan as of 1999.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 7.65 1000 ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Tajikistan rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 133rd and Tajikistan ranks 135th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.