Belgium vs Eswatini: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Belgium
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 287.86 1000 ha against 243.3 1000 ha in Belgium, a difference of 44.56 1000 ha.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 149th and Eswatini ranks 148th of 222 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 270.09 1000 ha | 318.61 1000 ha | 48.52 1000 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 259.28 1000 ha | 303.61 1000 ha | 44.33 1000 ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 243.3 1000 ha | 291.61 1000 ha | 48.31 1000 ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Belgium or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 287.86 1000 ha against 243.3 1000 ha in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Belgium and Eswatini?
- 44.56 1000 ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eswatini?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Eswatini rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Belgium ranks 149th and Eswatini ranks 148th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.