Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Oceania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
54,254 1000 ha
in 2025
Oceania
178,971 1000 ha
in 2025
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
19th
Oceania rank
12th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Oceania
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020072025

How they compare

Oceania currently reports 178,971 1000 ha against 54,254 1000 ha in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 124,717 1000 ha.

That makes Oceania's figure about 3.3 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 19th and Oceania ranks 12th of 46 regions.

Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Oceania Difference Ahead
1990s 60,538 1000 ha 180,507 1000 ha 119,969 1000 ha Oceania
2000s 58,330 1000 ha 177,947 1000 ha 119,617 1000 ha Oceania
2010s 56,645 1000 ha 177,561 1000 ha 120,916 1000 ha Oceania
2020s 54,864 1000 ha 178,827 1000 ha 123,963 1000 ha Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Oceania?
Oceania, at 178,971 1000 ha against 54,254 1000 ha in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oceania?
124,717 1000 ha, with Oceania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oceania?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oceania rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 19th and Oceania ranks 12th of 46 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Oceania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/oceania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Oceania: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.