Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Maldives: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
4.21 1000 ha
in 2025
Maldives
3.72 1000 ha
in 2025
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
186th
Maldives rank
187th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Maldives
01234199020072025

How they compare

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 4.21 1000 ha against 3.72 1000 ha in Maldives, a difference of 0.49 1000 ha.

That makes Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has been ahead every year.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 186th and Maldives ranks 187th of 202 countries.

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Maldives Difference Ahead
2010s 4.21 1000 ha 3.72 1000 ha 0.49 1000 ha Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 4.21 1000 ha 3.72 1000 ha 0.49 1000 ha Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba or Maldives?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 4.21 1000 ha against 3.72 1000 ha in Maldives as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Maldives?
0.49 1000 ha, with Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Maldives?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba and Maldives rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 186th and Maldives ranks 187th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Maldives: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/maldives/">Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Maldives: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.