Chile vs Finland: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Chile
- Finland
How they compare
Chile currently reports 15,008 1000 ha against 14,707 1000 ha in Finland, a difference of 301 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Chile ranks 39th and Finland ranks 41st of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,243 1000 ha | 17,402 1000 ha | 2,159 1000 ha | Finland |
| 2000s | 15,155 1000 ha | 16,416 1000 ha | 1,261 1000 ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 15,070 1000 ha | 15,062 1000 ha | 8.29 1000 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 15,014 1000 ha | 14,707 1000 ha | 306.7 1000 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Chile or Finland?
- Chile, at 15,008 1000 ha against 14,707 1000 ha in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Chile and Finland?
- 301 1000 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Finland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Finland rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Chile ranks 39th and Finland ranks 41st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.