Georgia vs Latvia: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 3,054 1000 ha against 2,903 1000 ha in Latvia, a difference of 151 1000 ha.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 92nd of 222 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,988 1000 ha | 2,892 1000 ha | 96.69 1000 ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 3,020 1000 ha | 2,975 1000 ha | 45.02 1000 ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 3,054 1000 ha | 2,981 1000 ha | 73.14 1000 ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 3,054 1000 ha | 2,898 1000 ha | 156.27 1000 ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Georgia or Latvia?
- Georgia, at 3,054 1000 ha against 2,903 1000 ha in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Georgia and Latvia?
- 151 1000 ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Georgia ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 92nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.