Georgia vs Pakistan: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Georgia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 3,066 1000 ha against 3,054 1000 ha in Georgia, a difference of 12 1000 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Pakistan ahead.
Georgia ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 240 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,988 1000 ha | 3,277 1000 ha | 288.43 1000 ha | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 3,020 1000 ha | 3,141 1000 ha | 121.35 1000 ha | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 3,054 1000 ha | 2,974 1000 ha | 80.04 1000 ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 3,054 1000 ha | 3,018 1000 ha | 35.77 1000 ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Georgia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 3,066 1000 ha against 3,054 1000 ha in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Georgia and Pakistan?
- 12 1000 ha, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Georgia ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.