Israel vs Martinique: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Israel
- Martinique
How they compare
Israel currently reports 50 1000 ha against 49.97 1000 ha in Martinique, a difference of 0.03 1000 ha.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 171st and Martinique ranks 172nd of 222 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Martinique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.55 1000 ha | 45.74 1000 ha | 19.81 1000 ha | Israel |
| 2000s | 65.45 1000 ha | 46.81 1000 ha | 18.64 1000 ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 68.8 1000 ha | 48.5 1000 ha | 20.3 1000 ha | Israel |
| 2020s | 52.5 1000 ha | 49.78 1000 ha | 2.72 1000 ha | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Israel or Martinique?
- Israel, at 50 1000 ha against 49.97 1000 ha in Martinique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Israel and Martinique?
- 0.03 1000 ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Martinique?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Martinique rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Israel ranks 171st and Martinique ranks 172nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.