Kenya vs Serbia: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Kenya
- Serbia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 3,761 1000 ha against 3,251 1000 ha in Serbia, a difference of 510 1000 ha.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 86th and Serbia ranks 88th of 240 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,710 1000 ha | 2,600 1000 ha | 1,110 1000 ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 3,421 1000 ha | 2,860 1000 ha | 560.71 1000 ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 3,600 1000 ha | 3,158 1000 ha | 441.86 1000 ha | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Kenya or Serbia?
- Kenya, at 3,761 1000 ha against 3,251 1000 ha in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Kenya and Serbia?
- 510 1000 ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Kenya ranks 86th and Serbia ranks 88th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.