Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Peru: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
287,763 1000 ha
in 2025
Peru
66,969 1000 ha
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th
Peru rank
13th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Peru
100.0k200.0k300.0k199020072025

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 287,763 1000 ha against 66,969 1000 ha in Peru, a difference of 220,794 1000 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.3 times Peru's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Peru ranks 13th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 310,291 1000 ha 75,621 1000 ha 234,669 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 306,450 1000 ha 72,615 1000 ha 233,835 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 298,681 1000 ha 69,700 1000 ha 228,982 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 290,618 1000 ha 67,733 1000 ha 222,885 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Peru?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 287,763 1000 ha against 66,969 1000 ha in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Peru?
220,794 1000 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Peru?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Peru rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Peru ranks 13th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Peru: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/peru/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Peru: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,468 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.