Libya vs Samoa: Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time
- Libya
- Samoa
How they compare
Libya currently reports 133.46 1000 ha against 113.6 1000 ha in Samoa, a difference of 19.86 1000 ha.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Samoa's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 161st and Samoa ranks 164th of 222 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 140.07 1000 ha | 124.23 1000 ha | 15.84 1000 ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 137.91 1000 ha | 120.75 1000 ha | 17.15 1000 ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 135.75 1000 ha | 117.27 1000 ha | 18.47 1000 ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 134.01 1000 ha | 114.48 1000 ha | 19.53 1000 ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Libya or Samoa?
- Libya, at 133.46 1000 ha against 113.6 1000 ha in Samoa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Libya and Samoa?
- 19.86 1000 ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Samoa?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Samoa rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
- Libya ranks 161st and Samoa ranks 164th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.