Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mexico: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
459,978 1000 ha
in 2025
Mexico
66,131 1000 ha
in 2025
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th
Mexico rank
11th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Mexico
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199020072025

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 459,978 1000 ha against 66,131 1000 ha in Mexico, a difference of 393,847 1000 ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 7.0 times Mexico's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Mexico ranks 11th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 544,625 1000 ha 70,753 1000 ha 473,873 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 516,334 1000 ha 68,878 1000 ha 447,456 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 486,165 1000 ha 67,500 1000 ha 418,665 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 465,533 1000 ha 66,459 1000 ha 399,074 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Mexico?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 459,978 1000 ha against 66,131 1000 ha in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mexico?
393,847 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mexico?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mexico rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Mexico ranks 11th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mexico: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mexico/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mexico: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.