Northern Europe vs Papua New Guinea: Naturally regenerating forest — Area

Northern Europe
53,346 1000 ha
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
33,970 1000 ha
in 2025
Northern Europe rank
26th
Papua New Guinea rank
25th

Naturally regenerating forest — Area over time

  • Northern Europe
  • Papua New Guinea
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020072025

How they compare

Northern Europe currently reports 53,346 1000 ha against 33,970 1000 ha in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 19,376 1000 ha.

That makes Northern Europe's figure about 1.6 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.

Northern Europe ranks 26th and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 32 groups.

Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Europe Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 56,216 1000 ha 34,467 1000 ha 21,749 1000 ha Northern Europe
2000s 56,112 1000 ha 34,248 1000 ha 21,864 1000 ha Northern Europe
2010s 54,328 1000 ha 34,089 1000 ha 20,239 1000 ha Northern Europe
2020s 53,481 1000 ha 33,982 1000 ha 19,499 1000 ha Northern Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — area, Northern Europe or Papua New Guinea?
Northern Europe, at 53,346 1000 ha against 33,970 1000 ha in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — area between Northern Europe and Papua New Guinea?
19,376 1000 ha, with Northern Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and Papua New Guinea?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Northern Europe and Papua New Guinea rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — area?
Northern Europe ranks 26th and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Europe vs Papua New Guinea: Naturally regenerating forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/northern-europe/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-area/northern-europe/papua-new-guinea/">Northern Europe vs Papua New Guinea: Naturally regenerating forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,468 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.