Armenia vs Belgium: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time
- Armenia
- Belgium
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 40.03 % against 36.29 % in Belgium, a difference of 3.74 %.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 190th and Belgium ranks 193rd of 206 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 % | 39.86 % | 0.14 % | Armenia |
| 2010s | 39.92 % | 37.8 % | 2.12 % | Armenia |
| 2020s | 40 % | 36.29 % | 3.71 % | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Armenia or Belgium?
- Armenia, at 40.03 % against 36.29 % in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Armenia and Belgium?
- 3.74 %, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belgium?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Belgium rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
- Armenia ranks 190th and Belgium ranks 193rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.