Aruba vs Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land

Aruba
100 %
in 2025
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
100 %
in 2025
Aruba rank
1st
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
1st

Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time

  • Aruba
  • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
020406080100199020072025

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0 %.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 1st and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st of 206 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Difference Ahead
2010s 100 % 100 % 0 %
2020s 100 % 100 % 0 %

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Aruba or Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
Aruba, at 100 % against 100 % in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Aruba and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
0 %, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Aruba and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
Aruba ranks 1st and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/aruba/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/aruba/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba-2/">Aruba vs Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.