Aruba vs Botswana: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time
- Aruba
- Botswana
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Botswana, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 222 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
| 2000s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Aruba or Botswana?
- Aruba, at 100 % against 100 % in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Aruba and Botswana?
- 0 %, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Botswana?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Botswana rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
- Aruba ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.