Aruba vs Equatorial Guinea: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time
- Aruba
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Aruba ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 202 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
| 2000s | 100 % | 99.99 % | 0.01 % | Aruba |
| 2010s | 100 % | 99.99 % | 0.006 % | Aruba |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Aruba or Equatorial Guinea?
- Aruba, at 100 % against 100 % in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Aruba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0 %, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
- Aruba ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.