Belarus vs New Zealand: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land

Belarus
74.76 %
in 2025
New Zealand
76.37 %
in 2025
Belarus rank
161st
New Zealand rank
159th

Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time

  • Belarus
  • New Zealand
020406080199020072025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 76.37 % against 74.76 % in Belarus, a difference of 1.61 %.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 161st and New Zealand ranks 159th of 206 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 80.59 % 81.3 % 0.7075 % New Zealand
2000s 76.43 % 79.44 % 3.01 % New Zealand
2010s 74.68 % 79.29 % 4.61 % New Zealand
2020s 74.76 % 77.52 % 2.76 % New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Belarus or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 76.37 % against 74.76 % in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Belarus and New Zealand?
1.61 %, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
Belarus ranks 161st and New Zealand ranks 159th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Zealand: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/belarus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/belarus/new-zealand/">Belarus vs New Zealand: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.