Belgium vs Israel: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time
- Belgium
- Israel
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 36.29 % against 33.33 % in Israel, a difference of 2.96 %.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Israel ahead.
Belgium ranks 193rd and Israel ranks 194th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.86 % | 42.65 % | 2.79 % | Israel |
| 2010s | 37.8 % | 43.85 % | 6.05 % | Israel |
| 2020s | 36.29 % | 36.26 % | 0.0333 % | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Belgium or Israel?
- Belgium, at 36.29 % against 33.33 % in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Belgium and Israel?
- 2.96 %, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Israel?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Israel rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
- Belgium ranks 193rd and Israel ranks 194th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.