Botswana vs Sint Maarten: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time
- Botswana
- Sint Maarten
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Sint Maarten, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sint Maarten has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 1st and Sint Maarten ranks 1st of 206 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Sint Maarten | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Botswana or Sint Maarten?
- Botswana, at 100 % against 100 % in Sint Maarten as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Botswana and Sint Maarten?
- 0 %, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sint Maarten?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Sint Maarten rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
- Botswana ranks 1st and Sint Maarten ranks 1st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.