China (People’s Republic of) vs Jordan: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land

China (People’s Republic of)
59.23 %
in 2025
Jordan
57.77 %
in 2025
China (People’s Republic of) rank
177th
Jordan rank
179th

Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time

  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Jordan
020406080199020072025

How they compare

China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 59.23 % against 57.77 % in Jordan, a difference of 1.46 %.

Across all 36 years both countries report, China (People’s Republic of) has been ahead every year.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 177th and Jordan ranks 179th of 202 countries.

China (People’s Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China (People’s Republic of) Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 70.55 % 57.79 % 12.76 % China (People’s Republic of)
2000s 66.4 % 57.79 % 8.61 % China (People’s Republic of)
2010s 62.2 % 57.79 % 4.41 % China (People’s Republic of)
2020s 59.52 % 57.78 % 1.74 % China (People’s Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, China (People’s Republic of) or Jordan?
China (People’s Republic of), at 59.23 % against 57.77 % in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between China (People’s Republic of) and Jordan?
1.46 %, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Jordan?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Jordan rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 177th and Jordan ranks 179th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Jordan: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/china/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/china/jordan/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Jordan: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.