Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land

Eswatini
66.47 %
in 2025
Marshall Islands
68.28 %
in 2025
Eswatini rank
166th
Marshall Islands rank
165th

Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time

  • Eswatini
  • Marshall Islands
020406080199020072025

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 68.28 % against 66.47 % in Eswatini, a difference of 1.81 %.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 166th and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 202 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Marshall Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 69.62 % 66.7 % 2.92 % Eswatini
2000s 68.69 % 66.7 % 1.99 % Eswatini
2010s 67.64 % 67.02 % 0.621 % Eswatini
2020s 66.76 % 68.28 % 1.52 % Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Eswatini or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 68.28 % against 66.47 % in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
1.81 %, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Marshall Islands rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
Eswatini ranks 166th and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/eswatini/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/eswatini/marshall-islands/">Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.