Middle Africa vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land

Middle Africa
99.84 %
in 2025
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
100 %
in 2025
Middle Africa rank
2nd
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
1st

Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time

  • Middle Africa
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
020406080100199020072025

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 100 % against 99.84 % in Middle Africa, a difference of 0.16 %.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 1st of 21 regions.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 99.89 % 100 % 0.11 % Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 99.85 % 100 % 0.1467 % Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Middle Africa or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 100 % against 99.84 % in Middle Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Middle Africa and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
0.16 %, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Middle Africa and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 1st of 21 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/middle-africa/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/naturally-regenerating-forest-share-in-forest-land/middle-africa/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Middle Africa vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 8,989 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.