Moldova vs Uruguay: Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land
Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land over time
- Moldova
- Uruguay
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 43.4 % against 42.34 % in Uruguay, a difference of 1.06 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Moldova ranks 218th and Uruguay ranks 220th of 240 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55 % | 64.23 % | 9.23 % | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 49.61 % | 52 % | 2.39 % | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 43.4 % | 46.19 % | 2.79 % | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 43.4 % | 43.03 % | 0.3767 % | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land, Moldova or Uruguay?
- Moldova, at 43.4 % against 42.34 % in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land between Moldova and Uruguay?
- 1.06 %, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Uruguay?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Uruguay rank globally for naturally regenerating forest — share in forest land?
- Moldova ranks 218th and Uruguay ranks 220th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Naturally regenerating forest — Share in Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.