Austria vs North Macedonia: Net Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value

Austria
66,664 million SLC
in 2023
North Macedonia
59,912 million SLC
in 2023
Austria rank
92nd
North Macedonia rank
94th

Net Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value over time

  • Austria
  • North Macedonia
020.0k40.0k60.0k199520092023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 66,664 million SLC against 59,912 million SLC in North Macedonia, a difference of 6,752 million SLC.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Austria ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 94th of 179 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 32,765 million SLC 46,996 million SLC 14,231 million SLC North Macedonia
2010s 45,842 million SLC 48,320 million SLC 2,478 million SLC North Macedonia
2020s 61,545 million SLC 58,678 million SLC 2,867 million SLC Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net capital stocks (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value, Austria or North Macedonia?
Austria, at 66,664 million SLC against 59,912 million SLC in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net capital stocks (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value between Austria and North Macedonia?
6,752 million SLC, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and North Macedonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Austria and North Macedonia rank globally for net capital stocks (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value?
Austria ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 94th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs North Macedonia: Net Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/net-capital-stocks-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/austria/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/net-capital-stocks-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/austria/north-macedonia/">Austria vs North Macedonia: Net Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
192 places, 5,493 data points, 1995–2023
Last refreshed

As part of the FAO Agriculture Capital Stock (ACS) database, the Statistics Division of FAO publishes country-by-country data on physical investment in agriculture, forestry and fishing as measured by the System of National Accounts (SNA) concept of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Additional variables included in the ACS are Net and Gross Capital Stock, Consumption of Fixed Capital, the Agriculture Investment ratio, and the Gross Fixed Capital Formation Agriculture Orientation Index. The FAO Agriculture Capital Stock Database is an analytical database: whenever available, the database integrates official National Accounts data harvested from the UNSD National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (UNSD AMA) and the OECD Annual National Accounts Database (OECD ANA). The database is further supplemented by OECD Structural Analysis database (OECD STAN) and, in a few cases, data from country’s statistics websites. If the full set of official data is not available for any specific country, imputation methods are applied to obtain estimates over the complete time series. Many data points in ACS are estimated and are flagged as such; they do not represent official submissions by Member Countries. With a view of producing internationally comparable net capital stock estimates, the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) with a constant geometric depreciation rate is employed to impute missing data. The Perpetual Inventory Method is a well-established economic model to calculate Net Capital Stocks (NCS) and Consumption of Fixed Capital (CFC) from time series of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Specifically, annual measures of the NCS are obtained from cumulating historical series on physical investment flows and deducting the part of assets that are depreciated (the Consumption of Fixed Capital that occurs in every period). In order to implement the PIM, long time series on aggregate GFCF in agriculture, forestry and fishing is required.An attempt is made to rely as much as possible on National Accounts data published by the OECD and UNSD. When country data are partially or fully missing, econometric techniques to impute missing observations are employed. Depending on the pattern of data missingness for the countries, different imputation methods are applied (from among the ARIMAX, PANEL regression, and OLS approaches) for the data series from 1995 to 2022. The values of Agriculture Capital Stock related indicators for 2023, including Agriculture Investment Ratio, Agriculture Orientation Index, Net Capital Stock, Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Consumption of Fixed Capital, are estimated using the Holt-Winters (HW) method (Cipra et al., 1995). The HW method is an exponential smoothing method for forecasting the annual values of economic variables. In this context, the HW method relies on existing (historical) values of the Agriculture Capital Stock. The predicted value is an extrapolation of the historical values to the specified target date, which extends the timeline without considering seasonality in the annual series.All data series in the database are provided both in national currencies and in US dollars as well as in current prices and constant prices with base year 2015.