Brazil vs Serbia: Newsprint — Import value, gaps filled
Brazil
11,886 1000 USD
in 2024
Serbia
10,695 1000 USD
in 2024
Brazil rank
44th
Serbia rank
46th
Newsprint — Import value, gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 11,886 1000 USD against 10,695 1000 USD in Serbia, a difference of 1,191 1000 USD.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 46th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 260,531 1000 USD | 57,019 1000 USD | 203,512 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2010s | 140,686 1000 USD | 27,000 1000 USD | 113,686 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2020s | 13,281 1000 USD | 13,864 1000 USD | 582.6 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher newsprint — import value, gaps filled, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 11,886 1000 USD against 10,695 1000 USD in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in newsprint — import value, gaps filled between Brazil and Serbia?
- 1,191 1000 USD, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for newsprint — import value, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 46th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Newsprint — Import value, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Newsprint — Import value with 102 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.