Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square

Sao Tome and Principe
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
126th
Zimbabwe rank
129th

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zimbabwe
00000197019962023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th and Zimbabwe ranks 129th of 201 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square, Sao Tome and Principe or Zimbabwe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square between Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th and Zimbabwe ranks 129th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 12,696 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.