Cuba vs Estonia: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture over time
- Cuba
- Estonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.71 Mt CO2e against 1.49 Mt CO2e in Estonia, a difference of 0.22 Mt CO2e.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
Across all 55 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 102nd and Estonia ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.29 Mt CO2e | 1.4 Mt CO2e | 1.89 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1980s | 3.92 Mt CO2e | 1.49 Mt CO2e | 2.43 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1990s | 2.93 Mt CO2e | 1.26 Mt CO2e | 1.67 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2.18 Mt CO2e | 1.28 Mt CO2e | 0.8994 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2.29 Mt CO2e | 1.46 Mt CO2e | 0.8348 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1.79 Mt CO2e | 1.52 Mt CO2e | 0.2741 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture, Cuba or Estonia?
- Cuba, at 1.71 Mt CO2e against 1.49 Mt CO2e in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture between Cuba and Estonia?
- 0.22 Mt CO2e, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Estonia rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture?
- Cuba ranks 102nd and Estonia ranks 105th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.2 Liming, 3.C.3 Urea application, 3.C.4 Direct N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.5 Indirect N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.6 Indirect N2O Emissions from manure management, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).