Ecuador vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture

Ecuador
2.87 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic
2.49 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Ecuador rank
79th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
82nd

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture over time

  • Ecuador
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
01234197019972024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2.87 Mt CO2e against 2.49 Mt CO2e in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.38 Mt CO2e.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 79th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 82nd of 201 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1970s 1.67 Mt CO2e 0.5426 Mt CO2e 1.12 Mt CO2e Ecuador
1980s 2.11 Mt CO2e 0.7811 Mt CO2e 1.33 Mt CO2e Ecuador
1990s 2.81 Mt CO2e 1.06 Mt CO2e 1.74 Mt CO2e Ecuador
2000s 3.17 Mt CO2e 1.29 Mt CO2e 1.88 Mt CO2e Ecuador
2010s 3.52 Mt CO2e 1.86 Mt CO2e 1.66 Mt CO2e Ecuador
2020s 3.18 Mt CO2e 2.34 Mt CO2e 0.8417 Mt CO2e Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture, Ecuador or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Ecuador, at 2.87 Mt CO2e against 2.49 Mt CO2e in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture between Ecuador and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
0.38 Mt CO2e, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from agriculture?
Ecuador ranks 79th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/ecuador/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/ecuador/lao-pdr/">Ecuador vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
248 places, 13,637 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.2 Liming, 3.C.3 Urea application, 3.C.4 Direct N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.5 Indirect N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.6 Indirect N2O Emissions from manure management, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).