Czechia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy)

Czechia
0.0026 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0028 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Czechia rank
107th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
106th

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) over time

  • Czechia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.0020.0040.0060.008197019972024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0028 Mt CO2e against 0.0026 Mt CO2e in Czechia, a difference of 0.0002 Mt CO2e.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Czechia ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 106th of 187 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0012 Mt CO2e 0.0052 Mt CO2e 0.004 Mt CO2e Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0019 Mt CO2e 0.0066 Mt CO2e 0.0046 Mt CO2e Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0013 Mt CO2e 0.0031 Mt CO2e 0.0018 Mt CO2e Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0017 Mt CO2e 0.0043 Mt CO2e 0.0026 Mt CO2e Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0061 Mt CO2e 0.006 Mt CO2e 0.0001 Mt CO2e Czechia
2020s 0.0034 Mt CO2e 0.0035 Mt CO2e 0.0001 Mt CO2e Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy), Czechia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0028 Mt CO2e against 0.0026 Mt CO2e in Czechia as of 2024.
What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) between Czechia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0002 Mt CO2e, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Trinidad and Tobago?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Czechia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy)?
Czechia ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 106th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy). Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e/czechia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e/czechia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Czechia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
234 places, 12,870 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from fugitive emissions (subsector of the energy sector) including IPCC 2006 codes 1.A.1.bc Petroleum Refining - Manufacture of Solid Fuels and Other Energy Industries, 1.B.1 Solid Fuels, 1.B.2 Oil and Natural Gas, 5.B. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).