Eswatini vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)

Eswatini
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
88th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
90th

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0000197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 88th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 90th of 203 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from industrial processes (mt co2e), Eswatini or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Eswatini, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from industrial processes (mt co2e) between Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions from industrial processes (mt co2e)?
Eswatini ranks 88th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 90th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Eswatini vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.