Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Turkmenistan
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan rank
145th
Zimbabwe rank
148th

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Turkmenistan
  • Zimbabwe
00000197019962023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Turkmenistan ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 203 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Turkmenistan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkmenistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Turkmenistan or Zimbabwe?
Turkmenistan, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?
Turkmenistan ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/">Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.