Democratic Republic of Congo vs Eswatini: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Democratic Republic of Congo
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
45th
Eswatini rank
48th

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Eswatini
0000197019972024

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 45th and Eswatini ranks 48th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Democratic Republic of Congo or Eswatini?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Democratic Republic of Congo and Eswatini?
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Eswatini?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Eswatini rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 45th and Eswatini ranks 48th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Eswatini: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nitrous-oxide-n2o-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/eswatini/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Eswatini: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP
Unit
Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 12,498 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.