Aruba vs OECD members: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Aruba
- OECD members
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 127.3% against -11.7% in OECD members, a difference of 139.0%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 10.9 times OECD members's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 40th of 203 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.4% | 1.7% | 39.7% | Aruba |
| 2000s | 60.5% | -5.3% | 65.8% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 85.7% | -8.3% | 93.9% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 115.9% | -10.3% | 126.2% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Aruba or OECD members?
- Aruba, at 127.3% against -11.7% in OECD members as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Aruba and OECD members?
- 139.0%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and OECD members?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and OECD members rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Aruba ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 40th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.