Burundi vs East Timor: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Burundi
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 138.1% against 129.5% in Burundi, a difference of 8.6%.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 38th and East Timor ranks 35th of 203 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3% | 38.9% | 39.2% | East Timor |
| 2000s | 8.6% | 70.0% | 61.4% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 67.9% | 110.1% | 42.2% | East Timor |
| 2020s | 108.9% | 129.9% | 21.0% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Burundi or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 138.1% against 129.5% in Burundi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Burundi and East Timor?
- 8.6%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and East Timor?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Burundi and East Timor rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Burundi ranks 38th and East Timor ranks 35th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.