Eritrea vs Zambia: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Eritrea
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 36.7% against 34.5% in Eritrea, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 111th of 203 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.9% | -17.1% | 14.3% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 16.7% | -14.0% | 30.7% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 27.4% | 16.4% | 11.0% | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 33.4% | 30.0% | 3.4% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Eritrea or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 36.7% against 34.5% in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Eritrea and Zambia?
- 2.2%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zambia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Zambia rank globally for nitrous oxide (n2o) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Eritrea ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 111th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.